By Guilherme J. · Updated April 2026
Pepperstone vs IC Markets 2026
Two Australian ECN heavyweights that look nearly identical on paper. Here is a granular breakdown of where they actually differ in execution, platforms, and regulation.
If you are an active forex trader evaluating ECN brokers, your shortlist almost certainly includes Pepperstone and IC Markets. Both were founded in Australia (2010 and 2007, respectively). Both operate a true ECN model, routing orders to tier-1 liquidity pools without dealing desk intervention. Both utilize Equinix data centers (NY4 and LD4) for sub-50ms execution. Both explicitly allow scalping, hedging, and high-frequency algorithmic trading.
Because their core infrastructure is so similar, choosing between them comes down to marginal differences in spread averages, specific platform integrations (TradingView vs FIX API), and regulatory coverage mapping to your jurisdiction. This is a comparison of details, not broad business models.
For a three-way comparison including Exness, see our Exness vs IC Markets guide. For the full context on ECN infrastructure, see the best ECN brokers comparison.
Spreads and Commissions
Both brokers charge a $3.50 per side commission ($7.00 round-turn) on their raw ECN accounts (IC Markets Raw, Pepperstone Razor). This is the standard baseline for retail ECN pricing.
The difference lies in the average raw spread. IC Markets publishes an average EUR/USD spread of 0.02 pips during liquid hours. Pepperstone publishes an average EUR/USD spread of 0.09 pips.
This makes the all-in cost per standard lot approximately $6.20 at IC Markets versus $6.90 at Pepperstone. For a trader executing 10 lots a month, the $7.00 monthly difference is irrelevant. For an algorithmic trader executing 500 lots a month, the $350 monthly difference ($4,200 annually) makes IC Markets mathematically superior purely on cost.
Platforms and Tools
Both brokers support MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Both platforms perform exceptionally well on their respective Equinix-hosted servers.
Pepperstone holds a distinct advantage for manual traders: native TradingView integration. You can connect your Pepperstone account directly to the TradingView interface, executing trades from TradingView charts without needing an MT4 bridge or third-party copy tool. For traders who use TradingView for analysis, this significantly improves workflow.
IC Markets holds the advantage for professional algorithmic traders: FIX API access. This allows developers to connect custom trading engines (Python, C#, C++) directly to the IC Markets liquidity pool, achieving sub-millisecond latency. Pepperstone offers API access, but IC Markets' FIX implementation is more widely adopted by retail algorithmic developers.
Regulation and Fund Custody
IC Markets is primarily regulated by ASIC (335692), CySEC, and FSA (Seychelles). Client funds for the ASIC entity are held in segregated accounts at National Australia Bank and Westpac, which provides excellent institutional custody but no government compensation scheme.
Pepperstone holds ASIC (414530) and CySEC, but adds FCA (684312), BaFin (Germany), DFSA (Dubai), and CMA (Kenya) to its regulatory portfolio. The FCA licence is the critical differentiator here for UK residents: accounts held under the FCA entity are eligible for Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) protection up to £85,000 in the event of broker insolvency.
For UK traders, Pepperstone is structurally safer due to FSCS coverage. For Australian traders, both provide equivalent ASIC protection. For international traders using the offshore entities to access higher leverage, regulatory protection is functionally equivalent between the two.
Execution Speed and Slippage
IC Markets publishes an average execution speed of 25 milliseconds. Pepperstone publishes an average of 30 milliseconds. In practice, both brokers fill market orders faster than human perception, and both suffer equivalent positive and negative slippage during high-impact news events (like NFP or CPI prints) because they route to similar interbank liquidity pools.
Neither broker re-quotes orders. Both brokers execute stop losses at the first available market price after a gap. For news trading, they are functionally identical and represent the best retail infrastructure available.
Head-to-head summary
| Feature | Pepperstone | IC Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Avg EUR/USD Spread | 0.09 pips (Razor) | 0.02 pips (Raw) |
| Round-turn Commission | $7.00 | $7.00 |
| All-in Cost (EUR/USD) | ~$6.90 | ~$6.20 |
| Primary Regulation | FCA, ASIC, CySEC | ASIC, CySEC |
| FSCS Protection | Yes (UK Entity) | No |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, FIX API |
| Execution Speed | 30ms | 25ms |
| Min Deposit | No minimum | $200 |
| Crypto Deposits | Yes | Yes |
| Islamic Accounts | Yes | Yes |
Which Broker Suits Which Trader
IC Markets is the optimal choice for algorithmic traders, high-frequency scalpers, and volume traders where a $0.70 per lot saving compounds meaningfully over thousands of trades. It is also the right choice for developers requiring FIX API access.
Pepperstone is the optimal choice for UK residents who require FCA regulation with FSCS protection, and for manual traders who use TradingView for their charting and want seamless integrated execution. The lack of a minimum deposit also makes it easier to test live with minimal capital.
Many professional traders split their capital across both brokers. Running the same automated strategy on IC Markets and Pepperstone simultaneously provides server redundancy and regulatory diversification without sacrificing ECN execution quality.
Related guides
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Pepperstone or IC Markets?
IC Markets is slightly cheaper for active traders. On the EUR/USD pair, IC Markets averages a 0.02 pip spread while Pepperstone averages 0.09 pips. Both brokers charge a $3.50 per-side ($7.00 round-turn) commission. This makes the all-in cost per standard lot approximately $6.20 at IC Markets versus $6.90 at Pepperstone. For high-volume algorithmic traders, this difference is mechanically significant. For casual manual traders executing fewer than 10 lots per month, the difference is negligible.
Which broker has better platforms?
Pepperstone offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, and native TradingView integration. IC Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, and FIX API access. Pepperstone's TradingView integration is a genuine advantage for manual traders who use TradingView for charting, as it allows direct execution without third-party bridges. IC Markets' FIX API is a major advantage for institutional and professional algorithmic traders who require direct market access outside the MT4/MT5 terminal environment.
Is Pepperstone or IC Markets better regulated?
Both hold top-tier regulation. Both are regulated by ASIC and CySEC. Pepperstone additionally holds FCA, BaFin, CMA, and DFSA licences. IC Markets holds an FSA licence for offshore clients. Pepperstone's FCA regulation provides FSCS compensation protection up to £85,000 for eligible UK residents, which IC Markets cannot offer since it lacks an FCA entity. For UK traders specifically, Pepperstone is structurally safer. For Australian traders, both provide equivalent ASIC protection.
Which has faster execution?
IC Markets publishes an average execution speed of 25 milliseconds. Pepperstone publishes an average of 30 milliseconds. Both brokers route orders through servers co-located in the Equinix NY4 and LD4 data centers. In practical terms, the 5ms difference is imperceptible to manual traders. For algorithmic traders running high-frequency scalping EAs co-located via VPS in NY4, IC Markets generally provides a marginally tighter execution environment.
Which broker is better for scalping?
Both brokers are true ECNs that explicitly allow scalping, hedging, and high-frequency trading without restriction. Neither imposes minimum holding times or minimum pip distances for stop losses. IC Markets holds a slight mathematical edge for scalping due to the marginally tighter average spread (0.02 vs 0.09 on EUR/USD), which compounds significantly when executing dozens of trades per day.
Do both brokers offer Islamic accounts?
Yes, both offer genuine swap-free Islamic accounts on request. Neither broker substitutes the swap with a hidden daily administration fee, and neither widens the spread on their Islamic accounts compared to the standard equivalents. IC Markets provides swap-free status across MT4, MT5, and cTrader. Both require a support request to activate the status.
Which has a lower minimum deposit?
Pepperstone has no enforced minimum deposit, allowing you to fund the account with whatever amount covers the margin requirement for your intended trade size. IC Markets enforces a $200 minimum deposit to open the Raw ECN account. For testing a live ECN environment with very small capital before scaling up, Pepperstone is more accessible.
Are both brokers ECN?
Yes. Both operate as True ECN (Electronic Communication Network) brokers. They aggregate pricing from multiple tier-1 banks and non-bank liquidity providers, pass the raw spread directly to the client without intervention, and charge a fixed commission per trade. They do not run a dealing desk model, do not re-quote orders, and do not take the opposing side of client trades.
Choose the ECN that fits your workflow
IC Markets for the lowest algorithmic execution cost. Pepperstone for TradingView integration and UK FCA protection.